| |
Hay Canibul,
I used to make conventional solar panels, been a few years
though but here is some of the info I have so far. I have spoken
and E-mailed (see below) to these guys about representing their
product in the Caribbean for use on electric boats and other
projects. DBK's Multiple Energy Level (MEL) Patent Pending Solar
Panels. JIL-1500 and 3000 solar panels are
IEC 61215 certified. DBK's new technologically for the advanced
(MEL) solar panels, are converting 70 percent of the suns
wavelengths instead of the others @ 17 percent. One or
two JIL panels are all that is needed for most homes, 5-6 panels
for most small businesses. (DBK will be donating over 10,000 of
its solar panels to remote areas around the world to build new
hospitals, schools and to power new wells for clean, pure water
for families and children. Approximately one out every ten
panels will be donated to improve the life of a child somewhere
in the world.)
PRODUCT NAME
BP Solar SX-160B, 160 Watt Solar Panel
Item : 1695 PRICE $
791.00
At this $ per 160 watt rated panel,
it would take 18.75 BP panels to equal 1-JIL 3000 panel,
and cost $14,831 plus shipping for over 620Lbs. Or $4.94 p/wt.
The JIL 3000 costs around $7,000 or $2.33 p/wt. (Less
than half the cost p/wt of the BP panel)
See DBK’s quote below:
Dear Steve,
7 JIL-3000 (3kw) panels, about 15 sq.ft.
each will give you 28 hp to run your boat. Is 105 sq. ft. too
big an area for your boat? Right now JIL-3000 costs $7,000 each.
Young Yang, Ph.D.
DBK Corporation
300 Carlsbad Village Dr. Suite 108A #327
Carlsbad, CA 92008
760-845-3616 (cell)
877-325-7693
760-918-6643 (fax)
yang@dbkcorporation.com
www.dbkcorporation.com
(Note from Steve, 7 panels would supposedly
run the boat with no battery draw down, I think 4 panels would
be enough with good batteries and run at 1/2 throttle. This cost
is likely not much more than the 21.5 KVA GENSET if I can get
them to credit it back!)
Last edited by stevem4u : 04-10-2006 at
19:33.
|
#287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More info from their site for you Canibul,
ABOUT THE JIL-3000
The current pictures reflect the prototype version of the
new model JIL-3000. In the manufactured version all cells
will be recessed and the surface will be smooth.
Question: How do you get so much power from a solar
panel?
Answer: We have overcome three major obstacles of
typical solar panel on the market: 1) photons which have
too short a wavelength bounce off and are not absorbed; 2)
those with too long a wavelength go thru the panel and end
up as heat; 3) and lastly electrons that sit on the skin
and fail to go thru the junction.
A typical solar cell acts more like a diode having one PN
junction. DBK technologically advanced solar panel
performs more like an integrated circuit (IC).
Question: Multi-junctions PV cells have been around
for years. What make your multi-junction cell different?
Answer: Most multi-junction cells use two or three
junctions. DBK's panels use a minimum of five junctions
each designed to serve different functions. Actually our
panels are configured from cells that have a band gap that
is considered unacceptable by other manufactures
(including embedded chips as shown on the prototype). This
is multiple energy layer technology (MEL)
Also:
04-10-2006, 20:00
High Efficiency Solar Cell
breakthrough
Posted on Sunday, February 19, 2006 @ 10:48:33 PST by
vlad
yru4 writes:
From KeelyNet News: In a scientific breakthrough that has
stunned the world, a team of South African scientists has
developed a revolutionary new, highly efficient solar
power technology that will enable homes to obtain all
their electricity from the sun. The unique South
African-developed solar panels will make it possible for
houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy
supplies. The panels are able to generate enough energy to
run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in
short all the mod-cons of the modern house.
The new technology should be available in South Africa
within a year and through a special converter, energy can
be fed directly into the wiring of existing houses. New
powerful storage units will allow energy storage to meet
demands even in winter. The panels are so efficient they
can operate through a Cape Town winter. while direct
sunlight is ideal for high-energy generation, other
daytime light also generates energy via the panels. A team
of scientists led by University of Johannesburg (formerly
Rand Afrikaans University) scientist Professor Vivian
Alberts achieved the breakthrough after 10 years of
research. The South African technology has now been
patented across the world. International experts have
admitted that nothing else comes close to the
effectiveness of the South African invention. The South
African solar panels consist of a thin layer of a unique
metal alloy that converts light into energy. The
photo-responsive alloy can operate on virtually all
flexible surfaces, which means it could in future find a
host of other applications. Alberts said the new panels
are approximately five microns thick (a human hair is 20
microns thick) while the older silicon panels are 350
microns thick. the cost of the South African technology is
a fraction of the less effective silicone solar panels.
Original Source:
SA Solar Breakthrough
-----------stevem4u
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Steve. But I am still skeptical. I see a lot of
press release info, and not a shred
of technical data. They keep telling the world what
they claim they've done, but not one of them is describing
how they have done it. I wrote several hundred press
releases in my life, and until someone can show me the
technical reasons these things work, I consider it all
smoke and mirrors.
I don't see the connection between DBK's claims and the
South African.
I did try to dig into the South African claim, and found
this on a blog:
Ok I checked at the Cape Angus newpaper site, and found
the original
story. Unfortunately I could not delve deeper into
their sources as you have to buy a subscription .
I checked at cooltech.iafrica.com (they were credited with
the photograph) and came across thier
story. The photograph seems to be a silicon-based
panel, not one of these new ones. (why they included the
picture is beyond me).
I checked into solar energy in South Africa (SA) and came
across
this site. Nothing mentioned about any revolutionary
solar panels.
I checked at the
University of Johannesburg and found nothing about it.
I checked into Prof Vivian Albert and found papers he has
written where he is looking into
solar cells based on CuInSe2, but nothing about any
breakthrough or anything.
Eskom, a SA power company, has nothing about it on
their website (not surprising really--why would a power
company want to promote a product like this?)
I have found some interesting sites ( here,
here,
here for eg) (run a search on Vivian Alberts for more)
It appears that Dr Alberts was granted money by the SA
government in 2004 to build a pilot assembly facility and
worked in co-ordination with physicists from the U of
Pretoria and the U of Port Elizabeth to produce the new
panels (and no doubt to test them too). The story from
cooltech is from Oct 2005, and appears to have been
essentially copied right onto the Earthworks site.
I really love the idea of a complete solar home, but so
far, there sure seems to be a lot of snake-oil involved.
Now, I am off to go invest in a perpetual motion
machine...
__________________
we could build our own Banana
Republic, if we would all just stop stealing the bananas..
Canibul 
05-10-2006, 05:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Canibul
I forgot to tell you
in my last email. Our panel gets 700 watts from
the sun to our panel and the rest is electronic
amplification to bring it up to 3000 watts.
We have a patent on the
system, it is our this is not a HOAX
inspite of what the skeptic's are saying.
|
For me, when remarks like this send the bulls**tometer
off the scale I know it's time to read no more.ess105
05-10-2006, 06:53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amplifying "power" as in Watts,
is impossible. Power (W) is the total energy,
or the sum of Current (Amps =I) and Voltage=V or E). VxI=P.
You can "amplify" or increase/decrease one of those two (V
or I) but not both. In fact, the other decreases/increases
respectively. Assuming you have absolutely NO LOSS, If you
have 700 W @ 12V, would mean you have 58.333A of current.
You could increase V to say 100V and the Current would now
only be 7A. But you can not make something from nothing,
so no, you can not amplify 700W and make it 3000W. Well
only in cold fusion, but that's still a dream. We live
here in the real world. And because we live in a real
world, you have to factor in inefficiencies, so you end up
with losses anytime you change something. Changing
something means work. Work done equals energy used. The
energy has to come from somewhere.
__________________
Wheels
Alan Wheeler 
08-10-2006, 14:41
For God so loved the world..........He didn't send a
committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alan Wheeler
Well only in cold fusion, but that's still a
dream..
|
Even cold fusion didn't claim to get something from
nothing. If that had worked there would have been a small
mass loss as Hydrogen fused to Helium which would have
accounted for the energy output (E=mc2).
Any process that claims to add
energy without being able to account for it's source is
bogus.
Steve ess105
08-10-2006, 15:25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good point Steve.
Rick, I don't doubt at all that vast improvements are
still to be made with Solar technology. What I was
referring to above, is that Watts
is the actual total Energy available from the panel or any
device and you simply can't make more energy by amplifying
it.
You can certainly become more efficient at converting
energy, (i.e. Sunlight to Electricity)
You can certainly obtain more energy per square ft by
converting greater energy bandwidths (i.e. wider energy
spectrum= -infrared-visible light-Ultraviolet)
But we simply can not change the
laws of Physics and I
think those Laws are rather firmly set as being accurate
today. At least within our dimensions of space/time and
known Universe :-)
__________________
Wheels
Alan Wheeler 
09-10-2006, 14:39
For God so loved the world..........He didn't send a
committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I ran the DBK claims by some commercial solar energy
installers....and they were, well, lets just use the word
"incredulous"..
__________________
we could build our own Banana
Republic, if we would all just stop stealing the bananas..
Canibul 
09-10-2006, 19:06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote=Alan Wheeler]Good point Steve.
You can certainly become more
efficient at converting energy, (i.e. Sunlight to
Electricity)
You can certainly obtain more energy
per square ft by converting greater energy bandwidths(i.e.
wider energy spectrum= -infrared-visible
light-Ultraviolet)
Has anybody commenting here ever been to DBK's factory and
seen the product? Put a tester on it? There seems to be a
lot of he said she said and that's just impossible stuff
going down here! (as well as other sites)
I’ve been speaking over the last 2 days with Dave
Tether, the inventor of the electric drive motors on the
L420 about these panels and the feasibility of using them
24 hours a day to motor sail.
He says he's been doing that as often as he can the
last few years on his boat with diesel backup, and sees
absolutely no problem in doing so. You might know, he is
the inventor and patent holder of the electric
drive/generator motors, from when he owned STI, and later
sold it to move to
Bénéteau and develop
the L420, we were on hull #2 at the boat show.
When I spoke about the DBK
Grid-Tie Photovoltaic (PV) Power Panels as the power
source instead of the generator, he said go look at them,
put a meter on it, if it works, count me in.
I said there’s a lot of “that’s
impossible!” comebacks out there! His comment was, that’s
exactly what they said when I announced my discovery,
because there was established math that supposedly proved
I was wrong. I knew they were wrong, so I built it and
guess what, proved them wrong.
So the proof is in the pudding,
put a tester on it, if it puts out 3000W, call me.
Their not that far away, so I'll just do that and then
I’ll know!
PS. Was good to see you guys at the
show!! Too bad one of the contactors went out so we didn’t
get our ride but hay the in depth show and tell on the
boat as just as well considering there was no wind anyway!
As well as getting the first brochure and DVD was great!
Nicholas, USA Lagoon, said she did 6 kts on no wind with
one motor. Not bag dad!! Steve M.
Last edited by stevem4u : 11-10-2006 at
18:46.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[quote=Alan Wheeler]Good point Steve.
You can certainly become more
efficient at converting energy, (i.e. Sunlight to
Electricity)
You can certainly obtain more energy
per square ft by converting greater energy bandwidths(i.e.
wider energy spectrum= -infrared-visible
light-Ultraviolet)
Has anybody commenting here ever been to DBK's factory and
seen the product? Put a tester on it? There seems to be a
lot of he said she said and that's just impossible stuff
going down here! (as well as other sites)
I’ve been speaking over the last 2 days with Dave
Tether, the inventor of the electric drive motors on the
L420 about these panels and the feasibility of using them
24 hours a day to motor sail.
He says he's been doing that as often as he can the
last few years on his boat with diesel backup, and sees
absolutely no problem in doing so. You might know, he is
the inventor and patent holder of the electric
drive/generator motors, from when he owned STI, and later
sold it to move to
Bénéteau and develop
the L420, we were on hull #2 at the boat show.
When I spoke about the DBK
Grid-Tie Photovoltaic (PV) Power Panels as the power
source instead of the generator, he said go look at them,
put a meter on it, if it works, count me in.
I said there’s a lot of “that’s
impossible!” comebacks out there! His comment was, that’s
exactly what they said when I announced my discovery,
because there was established math that supposedly proved
I was wrong. I knew they were wrong, so I built it and
guess what, proved them wrong.
So the proof is in the pudding,
put a tester on it, if it puts out 3000W, call me.
Their not that far away, so I'll just do that and then
I’ll know!
PS. Was good to see you guys at the
show!! Too bad one of the contactors went out so we didn’t
get our ride but hay the in depth show and tell on the
boat as just as well considering there was no wind anyway!
As well as getting the first brochure and DVD was great!
Nicholas, USA Lagoon, said she did 6 kts on no wind with
one motor. Not bag dad!! Steve M.
Last edited by stevem4u : 11-10-2006 at
18:46.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" Has anybody commenting here ever been to DBK's factory
and seen the product?"
That's the problem. Nobody outside that company seems to
have seen the product. And the "he said, she said" stuff I
posted was what I received in emails from DBK. Its not
hearsay.
If it worked as they claim it works, I would buy a million
bucks worth of their stock.
__________________
we could build our own Banana
Republic, if we would all just stop stealing the bananas..
Canibul 11-10-2006, 19:41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to the DBK thing, just for a moment, please. I would
think there are some sailors in the San Diego area who are
interested in DBK's claims that they could essentially put
these panels on their boats and run all the electric
appliances they could fit onboard.
perhaps someone in the SoCal area could drop by their
place and ask to see the system working. Preferably
someone who knows a VOM from a coppertop...?Canibul
__________________
we could build our own Banana
Republic, if we would all just stop stealing the bananas..

12-10-2006, 13:41
Canibul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve,
Thanks for the info. I read everything I could find on
those panels, I am trying to run an entire three bedroom
house. The specs are very attractive.
My problem is understanding, or in fact even getting a
description of, what makes this panel produce this
incredible efficiency. Their output claim is greater than
the amount of solar energy present on that surface, I am
reading.
If they amplify it from 700 watts to 3,000 watts, and
there's no other power source than the sun, I am having a
problem understanding the physics of that.
How are they putting out more power
than they are receiving?
I think its a simple question.
As another customer for them, do YOU understand the
process they are using ? If its patented, or even patent
pending, they are protected. Their
description of their process will be
available from the patent office anyhow. for
free.
I really really DO want to believe them. I am an easy
sell, actually. But I try to be a very well informed
consumer, as well.
Wanna see my personal ultrasonic bug repeller collection?
__________________
we could build our own Banana
Republic, if we would all just stop stealing the bananas..
Canibul 
04-10-2006, 19:54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|